Skip to main content

How to Build a Successful Team

Working with a group is really an art and a science. Much of it is methodical and some of it is just about attitude and grace. Quite honestly, there is an ounce of luck involved too. When it comes to working with a group, I find that there are a few things that can make or break the success of a team or group project. Based on my experience in working with groups (and I’ve had plenty), here’s what makes a team successful.

  1. Establish boundaries and structure from the very beginning. Even if all of the team members are on the same page after the first meeting, I can almost guarantee that nothing will get done for a long time unless there is at least some kind of schedule or some checkpoint deadlines. Nothing keeps a person motivated like a deadline, and if deadlines are set on day one, then there will always be a reason to keep team members accountable. Boundaries are important too. How do you want to communicate? What kind of behavior or action will just put you over the edge? What happens if the team can’t agree on something? What role will each team member take on? Setting these boundaries at the beginning will save time. If my team knows that I’m terrible at checking my email, then we can find a different way to communicate from the start so that we don’t run into communication problems half way through the project.
  2. Share the same passion. We all know what it’s like to have one team member that just doesn’t care. And it’s the worst. Passion is usually what drives effort, and when a team member doesn’t care, his or her effort drops dramatically. To avoid this, find people who share the same level of excitement for the project that you do. If everyone shares the same attitude, getting along will be much easier.
  3. Be understanding and flexible. This one might be the most difficult. Everyone works on a different schedule, so it’s important to be understanding of how and when different people work. If everyone is willing to be flexible and make adjustments based on other team member’s needs, then the work can and will get done. Establishing structure will help with this, too. If the team decides on a checkpoint deadline, then be understanding if a team member wants to work throughout the night. As long as the team set the deadline to allow for ample revision time, then there’s no reason to worry. Let people work how and when they want, and be willing to make adjustments yourself.
  4. There can only be one alpha. This doesn’t mean that one person has to run the show. What it does mean is that it is crucial that the team has a variety of personalities when it comes to group work. If you’ve never been in a group where two or three team members are fighting to be the sole leader, it’s not pretty. Establish a lead communicator, and make sure that he or she understands that the role is to manage and not control. Without this role, teams tend to fall apart at the seams and leave unmade decisions dangling for too long. But with too many, the team loses all cohesiveness and begins to form competition within the group.

There’s no formula for creating the perfect team, but in my experience, these are the essential pieces that really kickstart success. With this advice and maybe some luck, your group project might not be so miserable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Is Experience Architecture The Future of Professional Writing?

As a team of Professional Writing students, our mission is to discover how the Professional Writing major is evolving and share how and why experience architecture is making its way to the forefront of the field . It is our hope that readers of this blog — whether they might be current students, past students, prospective students, or professors — learn the ins-and-outs of the major and begin to see how the worlds of writing and design intertwine.  Professional Writing is currently a fairly popular major among universities, but one of the most interesting things about the field is that it’s always evolving. So what is the Professional Writing major anyway? When it comes to a major like this one, there isn’t a set plan of study among universities. In fact, the course requirements and the definition itself differ from school to school. Because of its natural diversity and constant evolution, Professional Writing doesn’t exactly have a clear future. If design and usability are becomin...

Think “Experience Architecture”

At the beginning of this class, we were assigned readings and videos about airports in order to conceptualize the main theme of the course, experience architecture. Experience architecture is the design of spaces (architecture) for users (experience), such as an airport. In de Botton's work, "A Week at the Airport," de Botton addresses a doubt about experience architecture that sheds light on the scope in which the concept applies. "Standing before costly objects of technological beauty, we may be tempted to reject the possibility of awe, for fear that we could grow stupid through admiration...[and] yet to refuse to be awed at all might in the end be merely another kind of foolishness. In a world full of a chaos and irregularity, the terminal seemed a worthy and intriguing refuge of elegance and logic." (de Botton, 2009, p. 3-4). Simply put, experience architecture is design that is meant for the experience of the user. De Botton communicates this through an exp...

Proposed Plan for Socially Distanced User Study of Wix.com

Plan for User Study: www.Wix.com I. Introduction Although a usability test is unlikely in this socially-distanced and pandemic-filled world, if I were to do one, this post describes how I would see myself doing it as well as a basic overview of my plan of study, had this been an option. II. Identifying Users 1. The users of this site align most with the age group of 20-35. This demographic uses Wix primarily for educational purpose and small business website platforms. 2. Users in this case will work through website creation, as that is the main function of the site. III. Target Identification of Problems Below are the main heuristics and an associated question to further explore the content of the site as I plan a User Study. A. Engagement Are the screen and workplace too crowded, and are they layered to maximize engagement? Is the site   nested too deeply with helpful tools to be useful? B. Error Tolerance Does the Help Desk analysis show enough specific problem de...