Skip to main content

Think “Experience Architecture”

At the beginning of this class, we were assigned readings and videos about airports in order to conceptualize the main theme of the course, experience architecture. Experience architecture is the design of spaces (architecture) for users (experience), such as an airport. In de Botton's work, "A Week at the Airport," de Botton addresses a doubt about experience architecture that sheds light on the scope in which the concept applies.

"Standing before costly objects of technological beauty, we may be tempted to reject the possibility of awe, for fear that we could grow stupid through admiration...[and] yet to refuse to be awed at all might in the end be merely another kind of foolishness. In a world full of a chaos and irregularity, the terminal seemed a worthy and intriguing refuge of elegance and logic."
(de Botton, 2009, p. 3-4).

Simply put, experience architecture is design that is meant for the experience of the user. De Botton communicates this through an explanation and analysis of the airport and addresses a fear of design and poses the question, does design matter? Should we hold it in high regard? The overwhelming answer is that design matters because it is the kind of beauty that involves looking at disorder and creating order. This perspective from de Botton of experience architecture also applies to other design contexts. If I write a report, I can change it from a 25-page word document into an interactive pdf with an appealing layout, making it more exciting for the reader and easier to navigate. If I am organizing an event, I can think about the layout of the space as well as the programming so that the event is easy for guests to navigate without confusion. Bringing order from disorder should be at the forefront of any plan and design. That is why this class is valuable to everyone who takes it, no matter what their future career path is.

I plan on being an English teacher when I graduate. I am continuously thankful for my major in professional writing and how the program has helped me develop in my critical thinking skills. I am learning more than "how to write." I am learning how to think about how to bring order, how to think about user design, and how to think about experience architecture. I can apply these ways of thinking to my teaching job on both the microscopic and macroscopic level. For example, on a small scale, thinking with an experience-architecture perspective will help me write lesson plans with the students as the primary users. On a larger scale, I can use the mindset to make more navigable course mapping and classroom procedures. Good design in the classroom will put the emphasis on learning rather than burdening students with trying to navigate confusing designs. This “designer's mind” is a skill that I will value–and certainly make use of, for the rest of my career.


Source: De Botton, A. (2009). A Week at the Airport. New York City, NY: Vintage Books, a division of Random House.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The UX behind Among Us

The online multiplayer game, Among Us, took the quarantined world by storm. A year ago the game boasted under a hundred players. Today, the social deduction game has nearly 400,000 players in a given month. Players join the online game to play against their friends or randomly assigned players from the internet in a murder mystery free for all. At the start of a game, users are assigned the role of crewmate or imposter. Crewmates must complete mini tasks and identify the imposter who is running around murdering crewmates and avoiding detection. The game has proven to be incredibly successful, but how well does it stand up to user experience standards? Accessibility This game appears rather simplistic; however, there are a few major accessibility design flaws. The first of which is something that I personally would have never considered until I discussed the game with a friend. The primary objective of Among Us is to identify the imposter who is sneaking around and killing crewmates...

One Purdue and the Employee Launchpad

Before the pandemic began, I was able to easily clock in and out of my on-campus job by swiping my Purdue ID card. Now, however, I have to clock in online through One Purdue and the Employee Launchpad. I often do this from my phone via the mobile website. Frustration led me to choose One Purdue for my expert analysis because I was often unable to accomplish my task. The mobile website often failed by not loading or giving an error. The options shown on One Purdue were also inconsistent, and I often couldn’t locate the Employee Launchpad before my shift began, even though it is the only application I have ever consistently used. In response, I decided to analyze One Purdue’s desktop website. In my findings, I have found that the desktop website is only somewhat better than the mobile one. Beginning with One Purdue’s weaknesses, there is simply too much going on. All of One Purdue’s 73 applications are included under the “Most Popular” category with very little information to distinguish...