Skip to main content

Bad Design: My New Excuse For Everything

Bad design tends to be my excuse now for everything that I can’t figure out. It’s true, really, that if it’s not obvious how to use something, then the product is probably poorly designed. The best example of this that I can think of is my combined oven and stove. The apartment I live in has quite an old oven/stove appliance, and I want to take you through why it fails the user miserably.

To begin, I’ll set the scene. I’m in my apartment with my three other roommates, and we’re all in the kitchen making dinner. It’s a small kitchen, so imagine a bit of chaos. I preheat the oven to 400 degrees. That part seems simple. I just hit “Bake” and then push the buttons with numbers. What’s confusing is that once I hit “Start,” there is no feedback indicating that the oven has been started. There’s no light and there’s no switch. To make it worse, it doesn’t even show me the current temperature that the oven is at, so I can’t check to see how much it has heated up. The only signifier to show me that the oven is on is a little beeping noise that goes off one time when the oven has reached 400 degrees. Now remember that I’m in my kitchen with three other girls, and as luck has it, the microwave beeps and the sink starts running and plates scrape against each other all at the same moment when the oven beeps. So at this point, the only way I can see if the oven is hot is if I open the door and stick my hand inside. Not the safest solution, if you ask me.

On top of the oven is the stove. The actual burners are arranged in two perfect columns and two perfect rows to fit four total burners. The knobs, however, are placed in one row with four separate columns. In my mind, the knobs farthest from me should be the ones to control the burners farthest from me. So the top right burner should coordinate with the knob farthest on the right. That is not the case. I can’t even count how many times I’ve sat waiting for water to boil for far too long before noticing that it’s not even warm.

I promise I’m not stupid. The real problem here is that this oven/stove set lacks important things: signifiers and feedback. A signifier is an indication to the user about how to perform a task. Feedback is a response from the product that tells the user that a task has been completed. In the oven and stove example, the oven lacks feedback. There is no light or visual cue to tell me that it’s getting hot or that it’s ready. For the stove, there is no clear signifier to tell me which knob controls which burner. These seemingly small design errors are what ultimately fail the user. And in the case of an oven and stove, the consequences are potentially quite dangerous.

Many times, the reason we as users tend to make mistakes while using a product is not to the fault of our own. Instead, like in the stove scenario, we make these mistakes because the product invites them. Not all poorly designed products are as obvious as the stove, but bad design is out there more than we think.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The UX behind Among Us

The online multiplayer game, Among Us, took the quarantined world by storm. A year ago the game boasted under a hundred players. Today, the social deduction game has nearly 400,000 players in a given month. Players join the online game to play against their friends or randomly assigned players from the internet in a murder mystery free for all. At the start of a game, users are assigned the role of crewmate or imposter. Crewmates must complete mini tasks and identify the imposter who is running around murdering crewmates and avoiding detection. The game has proven to be incredibly successful, but how well does it stand up to user experience standards? Accessibility This game appears rather simplistic; however, there are a few major accessibility design flaws. The first of which is something that I personally would have never considered until I discussed the game with a friend. The primary objective of Among Us is to identify the imposter who is sneaking around and killing crewmates...

My Take On Professional Writing

To me, professional writing is a set of reading, writing, analytical, and 21st century skills paired with an attitude of adaptability that make a person adept at communicating in the work place and producing content. For me, professional writing is a set of added skills to my future teaching career. It is also versatility to my degree so that I can switch into another field if I don't want to teach my entire career. It is an undergraduate degree with a variety of graduate degrees available for the stacking. Professional writing brings opportunity to me by providing flexibility in my academic and professional career. After taking 306 and starting off this semester in 515, I have added the ideas of advocacy and user experience to what professional writing means to me. Professional writers can advocate for the business they work for, their clientele, or both. Professional writers have the ability to communicate and should use that ability to speak on behalf of those who need their vo...

One Purdue and the Employee Launchpad

Before the pandemic began, I was able to easily clock in and out of my on-campus job by swiping my Purdue ID card. Now, however, I have to clock in online through One Purdue and the Employee Launchpad. I often do this from my phone via the mobile website. Frustration led me to choose One Purdue for my expert analysis because I was often unable to accomplish my task. The mobile website often failed by not loading or giving an error. The options shown on One Purdue were also inconsistent, and I often couldn’t locate the Employee Launchpad before my shift began, even though it is the only application I have ever consistently used. In response, I decided to analyze One Purdue’s desktop website. In my findings, I have found that the desktop website is only somewhat better than the mobile one. Beginning with One Purdue’s weaknesses, there is simply too much going on. All of One Purdue’s 73 applications are included under the “Most Popular” category with very little information to distinguish...