Skip to main content

What I Took Away from the iOS 14 Update

An exploration of what the newest iPhone update means for my attention, usability, and the future of personal technology.


Recently, I watched the new Netflix documentary The Social Dilemma, which depicts former Silicon Valley engineers and designers discussing some of the unintended ethical concerns raised by the technology they created during the early years of Big Tech.

The documentary explored how the business model of Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram has evolved to retain user attention as long as possible by targeting their interests. Longer retention allows the companies to sell more advertisements. This system has many negative effects including social media addiction, hyper-polarization, and large-scale spreading of misinformation.

Many users, including myself, worry that this addictive, attention-rewarding business model does not consider the well-being of their users. Watching the documentary, I began to wonder if Apple’s iPhone design benefits from a similar model. After all, it is the platform that usually hosts social media platforms, as over 80% of American teenagers own an iPhone and spend, on average, around seven hours each day using them.

Personally, I use my phone around four and a half hours every day. The Messages app is the first app I access after picking up my phone 65% of the time. The Google and Podcasts apps are where I spend most of my digital time, although huge chunks are consumed by YouTube and Netflix. I do not use other social media due to fears over their harmful effects.

As I approached the new update, my goal was to design the home screen in a way that helps me spend less time on my phone. I want to use it as a tool, or service, not as a means for extensive entertainment and connection through social media.

For those unfamiliar, the update gives users the ability to create “widgets,” or expansions of some apps on their phone’s home screen. Apps that offer widgets give users the freedom to display larger, more accessible versions of the app, as well as the ability to display the app’s features without actually opening it. For example, a weather widget displays the current weather in my location without any necessary interaction. App developers have complete control over what features these widgets can display, but users can often choose between multiple features and styles of widgets.

After personalizing my phone using the widgets, I was able to achieve each goal I wanted my phone to perform in just a few clicks and 1–2 seconds. The new widget features have some flaws, but overall, iOS 14 is a testament to Apple’s ability to intuitively help users to achieve their desired ends.

I expected that Apple would follow the dangerous, attention-retaining trend of the social media platforms, but actually found the opposite to be true. I did not encounter a single advertisement while completing any of my desired goals. Also, although Instagram can create a widget, it is not a medium that fits well with these types of apps. Widgets reveal the true lack of utility these applications provide.

I want to spend less time on my phone. I want to receive less notifications, and have less stuff waiting for me when I unlock and go to my home screen. It seems like Apple recognizes this desire and puts options into place to limit my time online.

The company also created a “Screen Time” widget, which monitors and displays the time spent on my phone and compares it to my average. This widget also makes it very easy to set app limits for myself or go into “down time” mode in just a couple clicks. This ease of limitation demonstrates that Apple does not need our attention. This is not their business model and not how they make profit. Apple is selling a tool, and it is in their best interest that their tool is used as effectively and efficiently as possible.

The iOS 14 update has actually given me more confidence in the future of the mobile/social tech industry. It signifies that Apple, as an organization, designs its experience to be in service to the user, not the other way around.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Professional Writing?

How did I end up here? As I've gotten closer to graduating from college, I've had people ask me how I ended up on the path that I'm on and why I made the decisions that I did. It still makes me laugh a bit when someone asks me those questions because truthfully, I've never felt like I knew what I was doing. The short answer is that I continually made decisions that I thought would make me happier in the long run. When I applied to Purdue, I already knew I didn't want to go there. No offense, Purdue, but I grew up in West Lafayette, Indiana, and I'd promised to my parents for eight years that I would be moving away for college. To my utter dismay, after all of the college applications had been submitted and returned, I found myself needing to make a decision between going to an out of state college (my dream) and taking out student loans, or staying here and graduating debt-free. I'm here, so obviously I chose the latter. Applying to the Professional Writing ...

Disney+ Relies on Users Already Understanding Streaming

  Disney+ did not officially launch until November 2019. At that point, streaming giants such as Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, and HBO were already streaming giants, and Disney throwing its hat into the streaming ring was only advantageous because the company’s movie and TV collection are extremely popular. This basically guaranteed the site would be successful no matter how the interface looked. While the decision to copy a lot of the design off of other sites, especially Netflix, might seem like a good decision, Disney+ also should consider that there could be new users that are not accustomed to streaming services that are dipping their toe into the pool with Disney+ for the first time. Whether the reasons be financial or due to lack of interest in what the aforementioned sites have to offer, this group of users should be considered too. The design of Disney+ mirrors Netflix in many ways. The sites are closer to each other in terms of design than any other combination of streamin...

Writing Professionally Outside of Professional Writing

In an earlier entry, I noted that one of my vivid memories from my time in professional writing comes from the ironic realization that I was doing very little writing throughout one of my courses. Instead, this computer-aided publishing class mainly focused on the design of text and other content that already existed, with the actual writing in the class dealing with the decisions that went into the creation or modification of any presented design. In a sense, this course therefore focused more on the overall user experience of a document—how the user would view all the words and paragraphs and content as a whole—rather than how one would create the technical written elements that were necessary to form the document in the first place. Perhaps to balance this out, then, I want to discuss a recent writing experience that I find to be almost thematically opposite. One of the classes I took this semester was Purdue’s software engineering class, described on the university’s catalog as an ...