Skip to main content

Disney+ Relies on Users Already Understanding Streaming

 

Disney+ did not officially launch until November 2019. At that point, streaming giants such as Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, and HBO were already streaming giants, and Disney throwing its hat into the streaming ring was only advantageous because the company’s movie and TV collection are extremely popular. This basically guaranteed the site would be successful no matter how the interface looked. While the decision to copy a lot of the design off of other sites, especially Netflix, might seem like a good decision, Disney+ also should consider that there could be new users that are not accustomed to streaming services that are dipping their toe into the pool with Disney+ for the first time. Whether the reasons be financial or due to lack of interest in what the aforementioned sites have to offer, this group of users should be considered too.

The design of Disney+ mirrors Netflix in many ways. The sites are closer to each other in terms of design than any other combination of streaming sites. They both have carousels organized by similar content. Disney’s carousel categories are a little more self-explanatory, like “Animals and Nature,” “Documentaries,” and “Reimagined Classics” (which refers to their recent live-action remakes). Netflix, however, has carousel categories like “Women Who Rule the Screen,” “Reluctant Adults,” and “Watch in One Weekend.” The creativity of Netflix’s carousel category titles makes one wonder why that’s not a characteristic Disney also “borrowed” from them for their design.

If a user hovers their mouse over a title on Netflix, it gives them options to play the content, add it to your list, thumbs up or down, or see more information. If a user does the same on Disney+, all it does is enlarge the title. A user has to actually click on the title to get more information or add it to their list, which makes it more difficult to add things when one has to click back and forth a lot more. Another action that is easier on Netflix than on Disney+ relates to TV shows specifically. If you click on a certain episode on Netflix, but then decide you want to watch a different one, there’s a button in the video player screen that allows a user to easily skip to the next one. There is also a pop-up menu that allows users to view all the episodes in the season, making it even easier to skip around. Disney+ has the same issue as before, where to see other episodes a user must exit the video player first.

Disney+’s launch led to more competition in the streaming war. However, by borrowing features from other streaming platforms, it makes its own design flaws even more apparent than if it had just started from scratch. While these issues may not be so hard for veteran viewers to get around, they might make it more difficult for newbie streamers to utilize Disney+.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The UX behind Among Us

The online multiplayer game, Among Us, took the quarantined world by storm. A year ago the game boasted under a hundred players. Today, the social deduction game has nearly 400,000 players in a given month. Players join the online game to play against their friends or randomly assigned players from the internet in a murder mystery free for all. At the start of a game, users are assigned the role of crewmate or imposter. Crewmates must complete mini tasks and identify the imposter who is running around murdering crewmates and avoiding detection. The game has proven to be incredibly successful, but how well does it stand up to user experience standards? Accessibility This game appears rather simplistic; however, there are a few major accessibility design flaws. The first of which is something that I personally would have never considered until I discussed the game with a friend. The primary objective of Among Us is to identify the imposter who is sneaking around and killing crewmates...

One Purdue and the Employee Launchpad

Before the pandemic began, I was able to easily clock in and out of my on-campus job by swiping my Purdue ID card. Now, however, I have to clock in online through One Purdue and the Employee Launchpad. I often do this from my phone via the mobile website. Frustration led me to choose One Purdue for my expert analysis because I was often unable to accomplish my task. The mobile website often failed by not loading or giving an error. The options shown on One Purdue were also inconsistent, and I often couldn’t locate the Employee Launchpad before my shift began, even though it is the only application I have ever consistently used. In response, I decided to analyze One Purdue’s desktop website. In my findings, I have found that the desktop website is only somewhat better than the mobile one. Beginning with One Purdue’s weaknesses, there is simply too much going on. All of One Purdue’s 73 applications are included under the “Most Popular” category with very little information to distinguish...

The Future of Technical Writing

Searching for jobs today can be difficult, especially with the ongoing pandemic. The future of technical writing is arguably changing, as we have discussed throughout class, and as soon-to-be graduates, it is important for us to remain diligent when assessing the future of technical writing positions. Here, I have researched more into the future of technical writing regarding AI, usability, and social media. One debate regarding the future of technical writing is whether or not traditional technical writers will be replaced by automated writing software. According to an article from Zoomin, automated writing programs are unable to entirely replace technical writers due to the nature of human communication; technical writers are necessary for analyzing the audience and tailoring content to that audience. Since automated writing is not able to replace writers yet, the article suggests that technical writers can use automation to help increase the value of their work. Bringing in automat...