Skip to main content

Simplicity is Sophistication

Apple’s sense of design has spoiled us, which is (probably) a good thing.


Throughout my life, I have consumed significant amounts of time using a variety of Apple Inc. products, including the iPod Nano (2008), iPod Touch (2010), iPhone 6 (2016), and MacBook (2015). I cannot say how much time I have spent with these over the years, but I can say that just today (it’s 6:00 p.m.) I have spent 2 hours and 32 minutes on my iPhone and 5 hours and 37 minutes on my MacBook. That’s 8 of my 10.5 waking hours spent using an Apple design.


If that average was consistent to the past 10 years (and I cannot definitively say it is not), it would be roughly 30,000 hours on Apple devices. What has caused me to invest so much time in this brand? Good design.

Apple prioritizes design in a way that other technology companies did not throughout the development of personal computers and smartphones. I would argue that Apple is still at the vanguard of technology development today.

Their outerwear is clean and simple, with a minimal number of ports, speakers, and buttons. Attachments like earbuds, air pods, charging cords, and Apple TV are also aesthetic pieces that look good on my desk, nightstand, pockets, and pretty much everywhere I go.

However, it is their user-centered interface that keeps me spending time with the devices. I recently read Walter Isaacson’s biography of Steve Jobs, aptly titled Steve Jobs, and was struck by Apple’s early adaptation of user interface testing. Jobs and his team were obsessed with constantly interrogating the usability of every minute feature. As Jobs says, “We believe that customers are smart, and want objects which are well thought through.”

The science of usability testing has increased our ability to create user-centered products. In fact, in following principles of design testing, and exerting enough time and energy into the process, it is becoming difficult not to create usable design. At a certain point, all mobile phone producers will make their features so usable that the distinction between sending a text on an iPhone and Android is only micro-seconds.

In this world, the iPhone’s beauty, and its simplicity of outer design is as important as its functionality. It is not enough that the devices we spend our time using have functionality, they need to look good doing it. Apple made tools that are also art, and in doing so have spoiled us as users.

Things as simple as exposed black wires or ugly fonts now drive me crazy, mostly because I am so used to being in the hands of Apple. There is nothing wrong with my design standards being raised by a particular brand, but sometimes innovation is messy. Not every new discovery that progresses technology forward will start with beauty and simplicity, but the discussion on where to sacrifice functionality for beauty and vise versa is far from being over.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Professional Writing?

How did I end up here? As I've gotten closer to graduating from college, I've had people ask me how I ended up on the path that I'm on and why I made the decisions that I did. It still makes me laugh a bit when someone asks me those questions because truthfully, I've never felt like I knew what I was doing. The short answer is that I continually made decisions that I thought would make me happier in the long run. When I applied to Purdue, I already knew I didn't want to go there. No offense, Purdue, but I grew up in West Lafayette, Indiana, and I'd promised to my parents for eight years that I would be moving away for college. To my utter dismay, after all of the college applications had been submitted and returned, I found myself needing to make a decision between going to an out of state college (my dream) and taking out student loans, or staying here and graduating debt-free. I'm here, so obviously I chose the latter. Applying to the Professional Writing ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Disney+ Relies on Users Already Understanding Streaming

  Disney+ did not officially launch until November 2019. At that point, streaming giants such as Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, and HBO were already streaming giants, and Disney throwing its hat into the streaming ring was only advantageous because the company’s movie and TV collection are extremely popular. This basically guaranteed the site would be successful no matter how the interface looked. While the decision to copy a lot of the design off of other sites, especially Netflix, might seem like a good decision, Disney+ also should consider that there could be new users that are not accustomed to streaming services that are dipping their toe into the pool with Disney+ for the first time. Whether the reasons be financial or due to lack of interest in what the aforementioned sites have to offer, this group of users should be considered too. The design of Disney+ mirrors Netflix in many ways. The sites are closer to each other in terms of design than any other combination of streamin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Writing Professionally Outside of Professional Writing

In an earlier entry, I noted that one of my vivid memories from my time in professional writing comes from the ironic realization that I was doing very little writing throughout one of my courses. Instead, this computer-aided publishing class mainly focused on the design of text and other content that already existed, with the actual writing in the class dealing with the decisions that went into the creation or modification of any presented design. In a sense, this course therefore focused more on the overall user experience of a document—how the user would view all the words and paragraphs and content as a whole—rather than how one would create the technical written elements that were necessary to form the document in the first place. Perhaps to balance this out, then, I want to discuss a recent writing experience that I find to be almost thematically opposite. One of the classes I took this semester was Purdue’s software engineering class, described on the university’s catalog as an ...
Post a Comment
Read more