Skip to main content

The Design of Handheld Tools

Playing around with the design capabilities of the Xbox Elite Series Controller is more fun for me than any video game.

I have never been a big gamer. However, my roommate recently purchased the new Xbox Series X and wanted to demonstrate all its new features and capabilities. There are times in our apartment when the Engineering-Liberal Arts divide is prominent, and my boredom juxtaposed with his passion for frame rates, cross-platform compatibility, and processing power was definitely one of them.

However, one aspect of the system did catch my attention: the controller that he purchased with it. I was fidgeting around with the toggles when, to my surprise, I accidentally pulled one out. At first, I thought I broke it, but then it was sucked right back in. I realized that every button and toggle on the controller is magnetically attached and detachable.

My roommate showed me the controller’s case, and neatly organized into little compartments, were different types of toggles and buttons that are interchangeable. He explained that the controller comes with different sizes and shapes features in order to customize the playing experience. Longer toggles make the controls more sensitive, but also more precise. He also showed me a key neatly hidden in another compartment. When you lock it into an empty toggle space and twist, you can raise and lower the give of the toggle, meaning more experienced players can make it respond quicker to their movements, and less experienced players can give themselves more room for mistakes and errors as they get a feel for the play.

In addition to holding special compartments for each piece, the case automatically charges the controller once it is set in its place. Its sleek all-black design is aesthetic and usable, since the user does not have to charge it using cords dangling from their televisions. It makes sense for the safest place for the controller to be where it should be placed to rest.

I was blown away by all these features and could not help connecting it to experience architecture and design. Good design should be obvious and intuitive, at least to those looking to use it solely for its basic purpose. Non-experienced gamers like myself never need to consider the customizable features of this controller.

The controller goes even further, however, and operates on two separate levels. For experienced gamers, it offers a world of changes and customization. This two-tied user experience is becoming more and more essential in design. If I am a gamer and play video games every day, of course I want a controller that better fits my hand and skill-level, but I also want it to be easy for my friends to play as well.

Most of our ubiquitous handheld devices are one-size fits all. To make the brand ubiquitous, every iPhone had to be accessible for everyone from toddlers to NBA players. The same can be said for video game controllers, hairdryers, wine glasses, and any other object we hold in our hands. For the most part, a fork is a fork. Something so simple is also so universally usable to become our culture’s standard eating device for centuries.

Lasting web design and the future of user-centered technology will be two-tiered, with the surface simplicity and usability of a fork, but customizable complexity of that Xbox controller. Look at the Google interface, with its single search bar. It is incredibly simple to an initial user, but for an everyday user like me, the Google homepage offers a wide variety of customizable features and displays. Or the new widget iPhone features that have been super helpful to my experience of the device, but more novice users (such as my parents) do not even know or care to know exist.

As our everyday-use tools and technology becomes increasingly complex, design is going to need to depend more and more on this kind of design.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Professional Writing?

How did I end up here? As I've gotten closer to graduating from college, I've had people ask me how I ended up on the path that I'm on and why I made the decisions that I did. It still makes me laugh a bit when someone asks me those questions because truthfully, I've never felt like I knew what I was doing. The short answer is that I continually made decisions that I thought would make me happier in the long run. When I applied to Purdue, I already knew I didn't want to go there. No offense, Purdue, but I grew up in West Lafayette, Indiana, and I'd promised to my parents for eight years that I would be moving away for college. To my utter dismay, after all of the college applications had been submitted and returned, I found myself needing to make a decision between going to an out of state college (my dream) and taking out student loans, or staying here and graduating debt-free. I'm here, so obviously I chose the latter. Applying to the Professional Writing ...

Disney+ Relies on Users Already Understanding Streaming

  Disney+ did not officially launch until November 2019. At that point, streaming giants such as Netflix, Hulu, Amazon Prime, and HBO were already streaming giants, and Disney throwing its hat into the streaming ring was only advantageous because the company’s movie and TV collection are extremely popular. This basically guaranteed the site would be successful no matter how the interface looked. While the decision to copy a lot of the design off of other sites, especially Netflix, might seem like a good decision, Disney+ also should consider that there could be new users that are not accustomed to streaming services that are dipping their toe into the pool with Disney+ for the first time. Whether the reasons be financial or due to lack of interest in what the aforementioned sites have to offer, this group of users should be considered too. The design of Disney+ mirrors Netflix in many ways. The sites are closer to each other in terms of design than any other combination of streamin...

Writing Professionally Outside of Professional Writing

In an earlier entry, I noted that one of my vivid memories from my time in professional writing comes from the ironic realization that I was doing very little writing throughout one of my courses. Instead, this computer-aided publishing class mainly focused on the design of text and other content that already existed, with the actual writing in the class dealing with the decisions that went into the creation or modification of any presented design. In a sense, this course therefore focused more on the overall user experience of a document—how the user would view all the words and paragraphs and content as a whole—rather than how one would create the technical written elements that were necessary to form the document in the first place. Perhaps to balance this out, then, I want to discuss a recent writing experience that I find to be almost thematically opposite. One of the classes I took this semester was Purdue’s software engineering class, described on the university’s catalog as an ...