Skip to main content

What Disney+ Does for Accessibility and What It Can Improve

Ever since Disney+ launched a year ago, I have had an account on it. Although I use it less than other streaming sites, I was still pretty familiar with it when I completed an Expert Analysis on it a few weeks ago. One aspect that I focused on was how accessible Disney+ is and what they can do to improve their accessibility. I focused on three main aspects: closed captions, audio options, photo-sensitivity, and cultural sensitivity.

Closed captions and audio options

Disney+ does well with accessibility in regards to these two features. Since Disney+ is available in fourteen countries so far, the seventeen audio options and fourteen closed captions options ensure many more Disney+ users beyond just those who can speak only English can use and enjoy the enormous amount of content on the steaming service. Additionally, one of the audio options is “English [Audio Description]” which allows English-speaking but visually impaired users to participate in watching Disney content too. When a user is watching a video, all they have to do to activate this setting is click the settings wheel in the top right corner to change the audio and closed captions options. The closed captions can also be personalized to a user’s liking by changing the language, font, and font color. This way, if one needs the captions to stand out more or blend in better with the background, they can do so.

Photo-sensitivity

Content that contains a level of flashing lights includes a warning for photosensitive viewers who may need to avoid watching it to prevent unnecessary health issues. However, it only comes on screen very briefly in the top left-hand corner after clicking on a title to watch, and it goes away so quickly I couldn’t even read what the whole warning said. While the inclusion of this warning is helpful and shows that Disney+ is aware of the sensitivities some of their users may have, the warning needs to be more “in your face.” My suggestion to improve this feature would be to have the warning as a pop-up screen that needs to be clicked on before the video starts. This way, the user will definitely notice it and make an informed decision on whether or not they should watch the content.

Cultural sensitivity

Similar to the photo-sensitivity warning but located before clicking on a title, videos that have “outdated cultural depictions” feature a warning in the description of the movie or TV show. Because Disney has been around for many decades, some of their content doesn’t fit the standards of the modern era. While the decision to show this content as originally depicted can provide users with the ability to discuss sensitive issues with their families, particularly children, the notice isn’t as visible as it could be. I recommend that the disclaimer be more specific to what is actually outdated in the title, instead of just saying that it’s an “outdated cultural depiction.” Additionally, the warning should be a different color from the rest of the video description or bigger than the other words. Otherwise, it could go unnoticed as easily as the current photo-sensitivity warning.

Overall, Disney+ has a good foundation for several different accessibility accommodations, but the service could make some improvements, especially to their photo-sensitivity and cultural sensitivity warnings. As the site continues to evolve in terms of new content, hopefully its accessibility features will as well.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The UX behind Among Us

The online multiplayer game, Among Us, took the quarantined world by storm. A year ago the game boasted under a hundred players. Today, the social deduction game has nearly 400,000 players in a given month. Players join the online game to play against their friends or randomly assigned players from the internet in a murder mystery free for all. At the start of a game, users are assigned the role of crewmate or imposter. Crewmates must complete mini tasks and identify the imposter who is running around murdering crewmates and avoiding detection. The game has proven to be incredibly successful, but how well does it stand up to user experience standards? Accessibility This game appears rather simplistic; however, there are a few major accessibility design flaws. The first of which is something that I personally would have never considered until I discussed the game with a friend. The primary objective of Among Us is to identify the imposter who is sneaking around and killing crewmates...

My Take On Professional Writing

To me, professional writing is a set of reading, writing, analytical, and 21st century skills paired with an attitude of adaptability that make a person adept at communicating in the work place and producing content. For me, professional writing is a set of added skills to my future teaching career. It is also versatility to my degree so that I can switch into another field if I don't want to teach my entire career. It is an undergraduate degree with a variety of graduate degrees available for the stacking. Professional writing brings opportunity to me by providing flexibility in my academic and professional career. After taking 306 and starting off this semester in 515, I have added the ideas of advocacy and user experience to what professional writing means to me. Professional writers can advocate for the business they work for, their clientele, or both. Professional writers have the ability to communicate and should use that ability to speak on behalf of those who need their vo...

One Purdue and the Employee Launchpad

Before the pandemic began, I was able to easily clock in and out of my on-campus job by swiping my Purdue ID card. Now, however, I have to clock in online through One Purdue and the Employee Launchpad. I often do this from my phone via the mobile website. Frustration led me to choose One Purdue for my expert analysis because I was often unable to accomplish my task. The mobile website often failed by not loading or giving an error. The options shown on One Purdue were also inconsistent, and I often couldn’t locate the Employee Launchpad before my shift began, even though it is the only application I have ever consistently used. In response, I decided to analyze One Purdue’s desktop website. In my findings, I have found that the desktop website is only somewhat better than the mobile one. Beginning with One Purdue’s weaknesses, there is simply too much going on. All of One Purdue’s 73 applications are included under the “Most Popular” category with very little information to distinguish...